DCHRN’s first full-day event took place last week on 21 April. The theme was fairly broad – ‘working with the public’ – and it allowed us to bring together four very different but, as it happens, complementary talks, as well as time for some interactive sessions. About 30 people in total joined us for part or all of the day, and as ever the mix of cultural heritage colleagues along with academic, library and collections colleagues from the University made for a really vibrant mix of ideas, questions and perspectives.
Network co-organiser Kirsty Lingstadt, previously based at Historic Environment Scotland and now the Head of the Digital Library at the University of Edinburgh, welcomed everyone and set the scene for the day.
Our first talk came from Helen Graham, who is Associate Professor of In/Tangible Heritage and Director of Centre for Critical Studies in Museums, Galleries and Heritage, at the University of Leeds. Helen focused her talk on the idea of the ‘commons’, drawing on a range of recent projects, including the AHRC-funded ‘How should decisions about heritage be made?’ project and the Inclusive Archive for Learning Disability History project. She drew a distinction between public goods, which can be used by all without being used up; and private goods, which are finite resources which have to be managed. She argued that cultural heritage institutions attempt to fuse public and private goods through a process of creating the category of ‘audience’ who are ‘all held equally and at arm’s length’. However, such a categorisation can create problems for some objects/collections (here she gave the example of synthesisers, which degrade if not played) and for some communities and groups. Helen encouraged us to think about conservation in more active ways – to consider the capacities of conservation to achieve a richer mix of forms of participation and inclusion.
Susan Ross spoke next, introducing herself in her new role as Gaelic Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. She introduced us to Gaelic Wikipedia and highlighted its role not as a mirror of English-language Wikipedia, but as a place for things that matter to the Scottish Gaelic community, and a hub for disparate resources which might otherwise be difficult to locate online. NLS sees Susan’s role as a way of extending awareness and access to their collections, while Wikimedia UK is working to increase coverage of underrepresented topics and include more people. Susan gave an overview of her plans to encourage participation, and highlighted key challenges around the small size of the Gaelic-speaking community involved with Wikipedia, and the consequences of this in terms of wiki-editing practice; and the difficulty of supporting and encouraging language learners while also engaging native speakers, who might be inclined to see the outreach projects as being only for learners. We hope Susan will come back and talk to us later in the project about how things went!
Our first interactive session was a quick-fire ‘speed dating’ activity, with everyone pairing up and moving around for four different dates, each focused on a question:
- What brought you here today? How is the theme of ‘working with the public’ relevant to your work/research/ideas?
- How do we make collaborations between cultural heritage organisations and the public sustainable?
- What value would the public find in your data?
- What is your dream co-production project?
After a very nice lunch and a chance to wander around the Moray House campus, our second two speakers presented their work.
First, Lesley Ferguson, Head of Archives and Engagement at Historic Environment Scotland, gave a fascinating review of online community-focused projects HES has engaged with over the past ten years, including Britain from Above, Scotland’s Places and Scotland’s Rural Past. Lesley showed how project teams and colleagues have learned to think about sustainability in a range of ways, including adapting functionality, earmarking income streams for longer term development, and planning for transfer of oversight of projects after dedicated staff have moved on. She noted that being sustainable may sometimes mean doing less, and talked about how HES is thinking about this, including their current ambition to develop a public engagement team which can work across projects. She also identified major cultural shifts within the organisation over the years, towards much more appreciation of input from the public.
Our final speaker was Victoria Van Hyning from the University of Oxford. Victoria is the Humanities PI for the Zooniverse platform, which brings together multiple crowdsourcing projects including Operation War Diary, Science Gossip, Shakespeare’s World and Measuring the ANZACs. She focused on the potential of crowdsourcing to offer scale, speed, public engagement, new questions and (maybe!) cost effectiveness to organisations, and shared inspiring examples of major transcription and other data projects which have made significant contributions to the organisations hosting them. She also introduced us to Zooniverse’s free Project Builder tool (https://www.zooniverse.org/lab), and talked about how researchers and organisations can make use of this. Around the room a bit of multitasking was also going on, as people discovered the simple joys of PenguinWatch.
Our final session of the day was a thought-provoking design exercise led by Network co-organiser Chris Speed from Design Informatics. Drawing on his colleague Ewa Luger’s technology ethics ideation technique for privacy by design, Chris had groups of participants work with scenarios involving personal biometrics, location tracking and smart cameras in cultural heritage settings. As considerations around users, technologies and the law were added to the scenarios, the groups became increasingly creative in developing visions of technology-rich projects and spaces for the public to engage with.
I found the day thoroughly thought-provoking and inspiring. The record of #dchrn tweets, below, gives some more insights into the discussions and key ideas from the day. Thank you again to everyone who participated, to my co-organisers, and to our excellent speakers.
Today is #dchrn day! Great series of talks and networking for cultural heritage folk, led and curated by @jar https://t.co/sXAVhaLN4p
— Sian Bayne (@sbayne) April 21, 2017
who is possibly excluded in a cultural heritage focus on ‘communities’ and ‘participants’? @HelenGraham64 kicks the #dchrn day off in style.
— Jen Ross (@jar) April 21, 2017
all held equally and at arms length – cultural heritage as a quasi-public good. @HelenGraham64 #dchrn
— Jen Ross (@jar) April 21, 2017
‘as soon as you stop playing them, synths start to decay’ – Martin Swan from @HelenGraham64 ’s AHRC heritage decisions project #dchrn
— Jen Ross (@jar) April 21, 2017
https://twitter.com/oldnorthroad/status/855352648345817089
https://twitter.com/oldnorthroad/status/855352966378921985
bringing voices not heard out into the public domain so that they can be debated #dchrn
— kirsty lingstadt (@klingstadt) April 21, 2017
#dchrn pic.twitter.com/6uB3JmIQu1
— kirsty lingstadt (@klingstadt) April 21, 2017
good question what does a person centred archive look like #dchrn
— kirsty lingstadt (@klingstadt) April 21, 2017
#dchrn pic.twitter.com/gtUGrECJOw
— kirsty lingstadt (@klingstadt) April 21, 2017
How long do people want to share their archive for just now, forever? #dchrn
— kirsty lingstadt (@klingstadt) April 21, 2017
interesting question about what metadata is required to search within a personal archive #dchrn
— kirsty lingstadt (@klingstadt) April 21, 2017
Good talk on Participants, Communities, Audiences and Publics by Helen Graham #dchrn pic.twitter.com/BEFPksW02T
— SCRAN (@Scranlife) April 21, 2017
Great talk on co-production by Helen Graham: 'Participants, Communities, and Publics' #dchrn pic.twitter.com/pzlsDu6PuY
— Victoria Van Hyning (@VanHyningV) April 21, 2017
https://twitter.com/oldnorthroad/status/855360539589058561
Amazing talk by @UniLeeds Helen Graham at #dchrn Working with Publics discussion day @EdinburghUni today! pic.twitter.com/QjaL5dI3so
— Olivia (@livlim23) April 21, 2017
Susan Ross on Scottish Gaelic wikipedia being introduced by Jen Ross. #dchrn pic.twitter.com/jVLQORjg5Y
— Victoria Van Hyning (@VanHyningV) April 21, 2017
Susan Ross highlighting Gaelic wikimedia and being a Wikimedian at large! #dchrn
— kirsty lingstadt (@klingstadt) April 21, 2017
I like the idea of a #wikipedian at large, who helps spread the word and recruit volunteers #dchrn
— Victoria Van Hyning (@VanHyningV) April 21, 2017
challenge of creating a crowd of gaelic wikimedians – how big will the crowd be? #dchrn
— kirsty lingstadt (@klingstadt) April 21, 2017
One challenge is having a #crowdsourcing model but not enough participants for a crowd on Gaelic wikipedia. #dchrn pic.twitter.com/SpMIP8URka
— Victoria Van Hyning (@VanHyningV) April 21, 2017
challenge of Gaelic language Wiki and how to engage native Gaelic speakers #dchrn
— kirsty lingstadt (@klingstadt) April 21, 2017
https://twitter.com/oldnorthroad/status/855369553802559488
Provoking exploration of need for differentiated participation (fluent; learners) and roles on Gaelic wikipedia by Susan Ross, NLS #dchrn
— Helen Graham (@HelenGraham64) April 21, 2017
How to get Gaelic Wikimedia into organsiation's Gaelic language plans @Conmaol #dchrn
— kirsty lingstadt (@klingstadt) April 21, 2017
Lesley Ferguson from HES talking about ten years of work towards sustainability of online community engagement. #dchrn
— Jen Ross (@jar) April 21, 2017
Now Lesley Ferguson on online sustainability #dchrn pic.twitter.com/I5MfUjYjdE
— kirsty lingstadt (@klingstadt) April 21, 2017
Listening to Lesley Ferguson of @HistEnvScot on sustainability of online projects at the #dchrn event. pic.twitter.com/S5Iy7zBsCg
— SCRAN (@Scranlife) April 21, 2017
reflections on how staff might see projects (in progress vs completed) vs how engaged participants might see them. Lesley Ferguson #dchrn
— Jen Ross (@jar) April 21, 2017
Commitment to link community generated digital content into core databases as is 'core business' Lesley Ferguson @HistEnvScot #dchrn
— Helen Graham (@HelenGraham64) April 21, 2017
crowdsourcing can offer scale, speed, public engagment, new questions and (maybe!) cost effectiveness. @VanHyningV #dchrn
— Jen Ross (@jar) April 21, 2017
the ‘free labour’ of crowdsourcing requires significant support (of tech and humans). @VanHyningV #dchrn
— Jen Ross (@jar) April 21, 2017
@VanHyningV : people say they participate in #zooniverse 'to contribute to scientific progress'.
Not gamified, larger purpose.#dchrn— Helen Graham (@HelenGraham64) April 21, 2017
I just found amazoncam at #zooniverse… there goes my weekend… thanks @VanHyningV 😉 #dchrn https://t.co/F3pKjYaJx1
— Jen Ross (@jar) April 21, 2017
Underlying principles of Crowdsourcing for Research Purposes by Victoria Van Hyning #dchrn pic.twitter.com/1VhFV1veAH
— chrisspeed (@chrisspeed) April 21, 2017
Crowdsourcing and with live penguins https://t.co/ctle4XsQnU what better way to help research @VanHyningV #dchrn
— chrisspeed (@chrisspeed) April 21, 2017
I got loads! #dchrn pic.twitter.com/oYYXtoeUlr
— chrisspeed (@chrisspeed) April 21, 2017
Using @ew_luger and @mooseabyte ’s Privacy by Design cards with digital culture and heritage groups #dchrn pic.twitter.com/wwW7kfXuAN
— chrisspeed (@chrisspeed) April 21, 2017
On to the Legal cards having sold the souls of Culture and Heritage @ew_luger @mooseabyte #dchrn pic.twitter.com/fs99cBAee4
— chrisspeed (@chrisspeed) April 21, 2017
https://twitter.com/oldnorthroad/status/855490582382350340