The first DCHRN workshop took place last Friday, 29 January, and feedback so far indicates it was a great success. About 30 people attended from across the University and from six cultural heritage organisations, and in the course of the afternoon we heard 13 brief ‘lightning talks’ covering topics from MOOCs to the semantic web to mapping literary history to the sustainability of digital collections.
You might also like to check out Lorna Campbell’s summary of the afternoon on her blog.
Rebecca Sinker, Curator: Digital Learning at Tate, gave a stimulating talk that closed with a series of provocative topics and open questions for the network to consider. She identified work to be done on issues including the ethics and value of visitor generated content; cultural value in digitised and born-digital cultural content; critical frameworks for digitisation and access; open (cultural) data; redundancy in technology formats and platforms, and new or hybrid research forms and outputs.
And there was time for informal discussion as well as an in-depth conversation about a series of research topics and questions identified by network members:
TOPIC 1 – PARTICIPATION & INTERPRETATION
How can digital media increase participation, enhance engagement and encourage collaboration between academic and cultural institutions and their diverse audiences?
How does meaning reside in digital cultural artefacts? How are voice(s) and creative participation encouraged, represented and interpreted?
TOPIC 2 – WEB & CURATION
Why are so few cultural heritage bodies really making use of semantic web technologies? Is it that they don’t believe it’s the way forward, or are there more tractable barriers?
Given the increasing amounts of cultural heritage data available, how might we develop forms and modes of curation and navigation which enable and support meaningful interactions with that data?
TOPIC 3 – DCHRN
One of the biggest challenges to networks like these is sustaining the initial contact and ideas through to achieving tangible results. How can we embed inter-disciplinary and inter-institutional relationships and practices in ways that will outlast any individual involvement in the network?
How might we address complex contemporary issues from dynamic and practical perspective, involving different fields of study?
How can the network infrastructure support digital research and cultural heritage?
TOPIC 4 – OPENNESS & PRESERVATION
How can we best preserve the rapidly expanding amount of cultural heritage data, in a world where we can’t all be librarians/information professionals?
As more cultural heritage digital collections become open, what new research opportunities emerge?
How can digital cultural heritage collections be released under open license and used more widely for teaching and learning?
You can revisit the afternoon in real-time by viewing the workshop’s Twitter feed:
The first workshop of the Digital Cultural Heritage Reserach Network took place on 29 January 2016, at the School of Education, University of Edinburgh.
Great first workshop on Cultural Heritage Sparks as part of Digital Cultural Heritage Research Network https://t.co/wgFMiJAnF3 @jar @UoE_IAD
— Festival of Creative Learning (@UoE_FCL) January 26, 2016
Our new network for digital cultural heritage research has its first workshop today – looking forward to it! https://t.co/Dnxk2TH3Es #dcrn
— Sian Bayne (@sbayne) January 29, 2016
http://twitter.com/oldnorthroad/status/693028286448934912
superb set of talks and a keynote from Rebecca Sinker @Tate coming up this afternoon at the first #dchrn workshop! https://t.co/QibIdGpDmb
— Jen Ross (@jar) January 29, 2016
Today at "Cultural Heritage Sparks# the opening workshop of the Digital Cultural Research Network at the University of Edinburgh #dchrn
— Maribel Hidalgo Urbaneja (@MaribelHU) January 29, 2016
Great excitement to sit down for the first sparkly #dchrn workshop in #Edinburgh
— GinaFierlafijnReddie (@Giraf87) January 29, 2016
This afternoon I'll be tweeting from the Digital Cultural Heritage Research Network event at @EdinburghUni if my battery holds out! #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@LLynO talking about the Keepers Extra project https://t.co/PC3oQf24pA #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@LLynO asking if we trust publishers with a stewardship role? #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@LLynO only 17% of journals are reported archived in the Keepers Registry #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
A superb afternoon in store hearing and speaking about Digital Inclusivity in Cultural Heritage. #dchrn #axschat #inclusivity
— Neatebox (@neatebox) January 29, 2016
Niki Vermeulen now talking about a new project to develop a digital tour on history of science in Edinburgh #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@NtlMuseumsScot are opening a new Science and Technology gallery later this year #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@warholmooc now talking about the openness of museum and gallery content #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@warholmooc The Warhol MOOC on Coursera https://t.co/Gft4saFuly #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@warholmooc talking about license restrictions which prevent copyright images from being used in online teaching & learning #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@warholmooc students expect to be able to find and use images via google #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@warholmooc many students understood little about copyright restirctions so lots of discussion about open access was needed #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Glynn Davis talking abouy artworks pictures copyright issues in art history Moocs and museums openness #dchrn
— Maribel Hidalgo Urbaneja (@MaribelHU) January 29, 2016
.@warholmooc Giving examples of cultural heritage institutions that have released content under open licence #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@jar now talking about the Artcasting Project https://t.co/JUNErA7vhW #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@jar project has taken a mobilities approach to evaluation practice #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@jar the project worked with the Mapplethorpe exhibition at the Bowes Museum https://t.co/GKhFHu36qi #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@jar the Artcasting iOS app allows visitors to capture images and decide where to send them in time and space #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@jar challenge now is how to translate the data from the app into visulatisations that can be understood by partners #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
.@jar concludes by asking how can digital methods be used creatively to reimagine complex issues? #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Jen Ross on the Artcasting project: an app which engages audience but also retrieves data for evaluation #dchrn pic.twitter.com/9Tbqo9T83s
— Maribel Hidalgo Urbaneja (@MaribelHU) January 29, 2016
Bea Alex talking about the Language Technology Group https://t.co/Aq8rutV8Ck #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Impressive range of projects from the Language Technology Group https://t.co/1lOVnBNxyM #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
#dchrn @jar 's art casting project https://t.co/W3HEDVpmgh
— Sian Bayne (@sbayne) January 29, 2016
#dchrn Glyn Davis' Warhol MOOC https://t.co/6gBxnHVOEV
— Sian Bayne (@sbayne) January 29, 2016
Bea Alex – Historical Texts project aims to use text mining to enrich textual metadata with geodata #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Bea Alex – the Edinburgh Geo Parser https://t.co/l9OgjTy8wN #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
#dchrn musical instruments collection at Edinburgh https://t.co/JeKCgIMJmP
— Sian Bayne (@sbayne) January 29, 2016
#dchrn Victorian photography MOOC https://t.co/TbNNBKVyM3
— Sian Bayne (@sbayne) January 29, 2016
Stephen Allen up next talking about the @NtlMuseumsScot Photography: a Victorian Sensation MOOC https://t.co/nCk2HyOdy2 #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Allen – the museum hopes to reuse the content from future exhibitions for more MOOCs #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Alison Duncan talking about Circulating Enlightenment: The Negotiations of Andrew Millar https://t.co/Z7TUBrvbOO #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Duncan – Circulating the Enlightenment website https://t.co/Zf06K8opZi #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Duncan – talking about the issue of how to find reliable primary resources on the web #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Wish I was at both #IHRWIN16 and #dchrn today – thanks for all the tweets! Hopefully presentations will be online…
— Victoria Stobo (@vstobo) January 29, 2016
Rebecca Sinker from @Tate now talking about the galleries Digital Learning Programmes #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Rebecca Sinker reflecting on the history of digital curation & education at Tate. #dchrn
— Jen Ross (@jar) January 29, 2016
Sinker – @tate set up the Learning Resource Centre to promote a practice based approach to learning, working alongside artists #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Rebecca Sinker of the Tate talking about refactoring working practice collaboratively. #dchrn pic.twitter.com/Mjd9dHhsS8
— Kate Byrne (@katefbyrne) January 29, 2016
Sinker – generating revenue in a priority for all institutions so evaluation is of critical importance, but research becomes less so. #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Sinker – calling something interdisciplinary doesn't make it so, people still work in interdisciplinary silos & don't exchange ideas #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Rebecca Sinker talks about her former research approach on digital learning which connects to digital artistic practice #dchrn
— Maribel Hidalgo Urbaneja (@MaribelHU) January 29, 2016
Rebecca Sinker: interdisciplinarity requires disciplines to be porous and able to generate new hybrids. #dchrn
— Jen Ross (@jar) January 29, 2016
Sinker – interdisciplinary is about entanglement #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
digital as tool; medium; technology; culture – are we sure we are all talking about the same thing? – Rebecca Sinker, #dchrn
— Jen Ross (@jar) January 29, 2016
Sinker – talking about @tate's Cultural value and the digital: practice, policy and theory project https://t.co/qJSTCCMvPv #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Rebecca Sinker mentions Tate's "Cultural value and the Digital" study #dchrn
— Maribel Hidalgo Urbaneja (@MaribelHU) January 29, 2016
Rebecca Sinker redlining the importance of Practice, Theory and Policy discussions in the public sector #dchrn
— chrisspeed (@chrisspeed) January 29, 2016
Cultural Value and the Digital by Rebecca Sinker. Concise and smart summary of… #dchrn pic.twitter.com/8xpeaxquOH
— chrisspeed (@chrisspeed) January 29, 2016
Sinker – @Tate Artmaps was originally set up as a crowd sourcing project https://t.co/g1c6jNHd88 #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
#dchrn Tate Artmap project https://t.co/eBFgzJcXEl Rebecca Sinker @Tate
— Sian Bayne (@sbayne) January 29, 2016
what does it mean to locate an artwork? – question in common between #artcasting and artmaps projects. #dchrn
— Jen Ross (@jar) January 29, 2016
Cultural Value and the Digital: Practice, Policy and Theory final report (PDF at bottom of page) https://t.co/RPPkmGPfC5 #dchrn
— chrisspeed (@chrisspeed) January 29, 2016
R. Sinker: museums haven't look at collaboratory & institutional critical artistic contemporary practice to develop learning programs #dchrn
— Maribel Hidalgo Urbaneja (@MaribelHU) January 29, 2016
Sinker – challenges from Artmaps; artworks may be associated with a pluarality of locations or none at all #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Sinker – Artmaps looked at different approaches to relating art to place – a sort of art orienteering #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Sinker – @tate Archives & Access initiative https://t.co/koVJFwIdDF #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
The entanglements or interdependencies involved in booking an airline ticket and departing the airport #dchrn pic.twitter.com/aj8qPJzxWb
— chrisspeed (@chrisspeed) January 29, 2016
Sinker – @Tate legal team have developed a @creativecommons licence for use with the archive #dchrn < #oer #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Rebecca Sinker on the Tate Archive & access project: Users get the same interface to search the museum collection & the archive #dchrn
— Maribel Hidalgo Urbaneja (@MaribelHU) January 29, 2016
Sinker – @tate archive collection data is available on Github https://t.co/Mm2w6OPzCh #dchrn #opendata
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
The resource implications for a research project (including 590 meetings) #dchrn pic.twitter.com/WBIHqYEsWu
— chrisspeed (@chrisspeed) January 29, 2016
Sinker – Taylor Digital Studio is a hub for most of @tate's digital education & learning activities https://t.co/zwPKtRqQcV #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Sinker – Taylor Digital Studio is a hub for most of @tate's digital education & learning activities https://t.co/zwPKtRqQcV #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Rebecca Sinker final remarks #dchrn pic.twitter.com/94tNHp5c5w
— Maribel Hidalgo Urbaneja (@MaribelHU) January 29, 2016
Sinker – issues raised: Digitisation / access projects often don't sit within a critical framework #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Sinker – issues raised: more cultural heritage data needs to be open #dchrn <Yes! Also content #opendata #oer
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Sinker – issues raised: redundancy in technology formats & platforms #dchrn < This is why open standards are so important
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Ahem… #dchrn :} https://t.co/ZQFw3Bi1Ww
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Sinker – @Tate & @khanacademy collaboration https://t.co/R2myhPq5Qh #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Interesting discussion regarding how people engage with art now that so much of it is available online #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Going to take a break from #dchrn tweeting now as I'm speaking in this next session.
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Lovely semantic web example from @katefbyrne #dchrn pic.twitter.com/kaOy2c8Y2b
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Can't not tweet this…Angelica Thumala talking about emotional attachment to books in different modalities #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Thumala – books are constant companions, people carry them around & develop physical & emotional attachments to them #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Thinking about open educational resources at #dchrn with Lorna Campbell pic.twitter.com/WeL7Sddx51
— Claire Sowton (@_ClaireSowton) January 29, 2016
Chris Speed talking about Shoplifting Data…and apparently he has a self confessed obsession with toilet paper… #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Speed asking if there are things that are more than human in our relationship with artifacts. #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Speed "the fridge is watching the kettle and there's a human in the network" < eh?! 🙂 #dchrn
— Lorna M. Campbell (@LornaMCampbell) January 29, 2016
Great first Digital Cultural Heritage Research Network. Looking forward to the next on 22nd March. #DCHRN
— Claire Sowton (@_ClaireSowton) January 29, 2016
@sbayne #dchrn sounds great! Any room for a digital archaeologist on the next workshop?
— alex hale (@alexgchale) January 29, 2016
@alexgchale @sbayne absolutely! we’ll be in touch. 🙂 #dchrn
— Jen Ross (@jar) February 1, 2016
The next workshop is taking place on Tuesday 22 March, at the National Museums of Scotland. Feel free to get in touch if you’d like to join us and haven’t already registered!
One reply on “Recap of Workshop 1: Cultural Heritage Sparks”
[…] Anyone who follows this blog will know that I have a bit of a thing about opening access to digital cultural resources so I was pleased to be able to contribute a lightning talk on digital cultural heritage and open education. This was one of an eclectic series of lightning talks that covered a wide range of subjects and topics. I live tweeted the event and Jen Ross has collated tweets from the day in a Storify here: Digital Cultural Heritage Research Network, Workshop 1 and has also written a recap of the workshop here Recap of Workshop 1: Cultural Heritage Sparks. […]